SGMC HEALTH

Acute Care Hospitals Valdosta, GA Emergency Services
2/5
Overall Rating
2/5
Hospital Type
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership
Government - Hospital District or Authority
Emergency
Yes

Hospital Information

Facility NameSGMC HEALTH
Address2501 NORTH PATTERSON STREET, PO BOX 1727
Valdosta, GA 31602
CountyLOWNDES
Hospital TypeAcute Care Hospitals
OwnershipGovernment - Hospital District or Authority
Emergency ServicesYes
Phone(229) 333-1020

Quality Measures & Clinical Outcomes

Other Measures

Measure Score vs. National
Emergency department volume high
Global Malnutrition Composite Score 5 Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Diagnosis Documented 5 Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Malnutrition Risk Screening 5 Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutrition Assessment 5 Not Available
Global Malnutrition Composite Score: Nutritional Care Plan 5 Not Available
Hospital Harm - Severe Hyperglycemia 5 Not Available
Hospital Harm - Severe Hypoglycemia 5 Not Available
Hospital Harm - Opioid Related Adverse Events Based on 8,893 patients 0
Hybrid Hospital-Wide All-Cause Risk Standardized Mortality Rate Based on 1,419 patients 4.7 No Different Than the National Rate
Safe Use of Opioids - Concurrent Prescribing Based on 4,419 patients 17
Severe Sepsis 3-Hour Bundle Based on 209 patients 2 56
Severe Sepsis 6-Hour Bundle Based on 80 patients 2 92

Complications

Measure Score vs. National
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 1 Not Available Number of Cases Too Small

Healthcare-Associated Infections

Measure Score vs. National
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.074 Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 0.790 Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 9807 Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 10.337 Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 3 Better than the National Benchmark
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) 0.290 Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit 0.142 Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit 0.856 Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 10410 Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 12.940 Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 5 Better than the National Benchmark
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) 0.386 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit 0.007 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit 0.641 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 264 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 7.689 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 1 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Colon Surgery 0.130 Better than the National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit 0.176 No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit 3.467 No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 231 No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 1.906 No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 2 No Different than National Benchmark
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy 1.049 No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit 0.718 No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit 3.247 No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 80688 No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 4.265 No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 7 No Different than National Benchmark
MRSA Bacteremia 1.641 No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.726 No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 1.373 No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 76092 No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 37.589 No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 38 No Different than National Benchmark
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 1.011 No Different than National Benchmark

Immunization

Measure Score vs. National
Healthcare workers given influenza vaccination Based on 4,136 patients 96

Mortality

Measure Score vs. National
Death rate for heart attack patients Based on 195 patients 13.4 No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for CABG surgery patients Based on 63 patients 2 No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for COPD patients Based on 144 patients 8.6 No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for heart failure patients Based on 408 patients 14.6 Worse Than the National Rate
Death rate for pneumonia patients Based on 535 patients 18.3 No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate for stroke patients Based on 195 patients 16.9 No Different Than the National Rate

Outpatient Procedures

Measure Score vs. National
Average (median) time all patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit, including psychiatric/mental health patients and patients who were transferred to another facility. A lower number of minutes is better Based on 490 patients 208
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit A lower number of minutes is better Based on 468 patients 202
Average (median) time patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit- Psychiatric/Mental Health Patients. A lower number of minutes is better Based on 18 patients 464
Average (median) time transfer patients spent in the emergency department before leaving from the visit. A lower number of minutes is better 1 Not Available
Left before being seen Based on 58,506 patients 4
Head CT results Based on 23 patients 48
Endoscopy/polyp surveillance: appropriate follow-up interval for normal colonoscopy in average risk patients Based on 59 patients 90
Improvement in Patient's Visual Function within 90 Days Following Cataract Surgery 5 Not Available
ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) 1 Not Available

Patient Safety

Measure Score vs. National
Pressure ulcer rate Based on 5,133 patients 0.35 No Different Than the National Rate
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications Based on 72 patients 192.20 No Different Than the National Rate
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate Based on 6,043 patients 0.16 No Different Than the National Rate
In-hospital fall-associated fracture rate Based on 6,121 patients 0.26 No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate Based on 1,164 patients 3.01 No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate Based on 383 patients 1.82 No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative respiratory failure rate Based on 412 patients 9.79 No Different Than the National Rate
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate Based on 1,217 patients 3.34 No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative sepsis rate Based on 335 patients 6.54 No Different Than the National Rate
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate Based on 276 patients 1.58 No Different Than the National Rate
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate Based on 888 patients 1.11 No Different Than the National Rate
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.97 No Different Than the National Value

Sepsis Care

Measure Score vs. National
Appropriate care for severe sepsis and septic shock Based on 209 patients 2 36
Septic Shock 3-Hour Bundle Based on 64 patients 2 53
Septic Shock 6-Hour Bundle Based on 25 patients 2 80

Stroke Care

Measure Score vs. National
Discharged on Antithrombotic Therapy Based on 284 patients 95
Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter 5 Not Available
Antithrombotic Therapy by End of Hospital Day 2 5 Not Available

Venous Thromboembolism

Measure Score vs. National
Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Based on 5,712 patients 96
Intensive Care Unit Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis 5 Not Available

Patient Experience (HCAHPS Survey)

Based on 1,180 completed surveys. Response rate: 19%.

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well

Response: 77% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Response: 6% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well

Response: 17% Score: Not Applicable

Nurse communication - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 91

Nurse communication - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Response: 84% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Response: 4% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Response: 12% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them

Response: 74% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Response: 7% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them

Response: 19% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Response: 73% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Response: 6% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Response: 21% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well

Response: 80% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well

Response: 5% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well

Response: 15% Score: Not Applicable

Doctor communication - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 92

Doctor communication - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect

Response: 86% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect

Response: 3% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect

Response: 11% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them

Response: 79% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them

Response: 5% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them

Response: 16% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand

Response: 76% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand

Response: 6% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand

Response: 18% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Response: 61% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Response: 21% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them

Response: 18% Score: Not Applicable

Communication about medicines - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 77

Communication about medicines - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for

Response: 74% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for

Response: 11% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for.

Response: 15% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects

Response: 48% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects

Response: 31% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects

Response: 21% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Response: 14% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home

Response: 86% Score: Not Applicable

Discharge information - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 85

Discharge information - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Response: 15% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge

Response: 85% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Response: 12% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge

Response: 88% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean

Response: 67% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean

Response: 15% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean

Response: 18% Score: Not Applicable

Cleanliness - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 83

Cleanliness - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night

Response: 67% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night

Response: 7% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night

Response: 26% Score: Not Applicable

Quietness - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 87

Quietness - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Response: 10% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Response: 22% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest)

Response: 68% Score: Not Applicable

Overall hospital rating - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 87

Overall hospital rating - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital

Response: 8% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital

Response: 66% Score: Not Applicable

Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital

Response: 26% Score: Not Applicable

Recommend hospital - linear mean score

Response: Not Applicable% Score: 85

Recommend hospital - star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Summary star rating

Response: Not Applicable% Score: Not Applicable

Quick Facts

  • Type Acute Care Hospitals
  • Ownership Government - Hospital District or Authority
  • Rating 2/5
  • Emergency Yes
  • Measures 88 recorded

Data Source

Hospital data from CMS Hospital Compare. Quality measures and patient experience surveys are updated periodically by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

About SGMC HEALTH

SGMC HEALTH is a acute care hospitals located in Valdosta, Georgia. The facility is government - hospital district or authority owned and provides emergency services. It has an overall quality rating of 2 out of 5 stars from CMS. This hospital has 88 quality measures on record, covering areas such as mortality, readmission rates, complications, and patient safety. Patient experience is measured through the HCAHPS survey, with 1,180 surveys available for review.